Contributors

Jeremiah Grossman
(WhiteHat Security)

Ofer Shezaf
(Breach Security) [Project Leader]

The Web Hacking Incidents Database
Last update:17 February 2008

List of Incidents for a Classification

Please note that classifications are a new feature and not all entries in WHID are already classified, so when you get a certain number of entries for a classification, WHID might have more records matching that classification that we did not classify yet. We hope to complete the classification process soon.

Select classification:
Attack Method, Country, Location, Origin, Outcome, Software, Vertical

Select criteria for classification "Attack Method":
Abuse of Functionality, Administration Error, Brute Force, Buffer Overflow, Content Spoofing, Credential/Session Prediction, Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Cross Site Scripting (XSS), Denial of Service, Directory Indexing, Drive by Pharming, Failure to Restrict URL Access, Format String Attack, HTTP Response Splitting, Improper Error Handling, Insecure Direct Object Reference, Insufficient Anti-automation, Insufficient Authentication, Insufficient Authorization, Insufficient Process Validation, Insufficient Session Expiration, Known Vulnerability, LDAP Injection, Misconfiguration, OS Commanding, Other, Path Traversal, Predictable Resource Location, Redirection, Session Fixation, Session Hijacking, SQL Injection, SSI Injection, Unintentional Information Disclosure, Unknown, Weak Password Recovery Validation, XPath Injection


List of incidents for which Attack Method is Insufficient Session Expiration
WHID 2007-26: $1,000,000 CNBC stock trading contest hacked
Reported: 12 June 2007
Occurred: 11 June 2007

Classifications:

  • Attack Method: Insufficient Anti-automation
  • Attack Method: Insufficient Session Expiration
  • Country: USA
  • Outcome: Deceit
  • Vertical: Media

The CNBC stock trading reality TV show was even more real than contenders thought it would be. It seems that players learned to cheat the game by opening a browser form to by a stock before closing and issuing the transaction, at the set price, only after closing, when more information is already available.

The interesting anecdote is that the person who discovered the issue has used a different, but also questionable technique of maintaining a very large number of portfolios automatically managed by automated programs using the fact that the game allowed a user to have any number of portfolios but only the best one is counted. Kosher, but stinks.

This story remind an older story about a predictable delay in a poker game that enabled gamblers to beat the house.

References:



This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

 
© Copyright 2005, Web Application Security Consortium. All rights reserved.