[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [WEB SECURITY] Interview With Jeremiah Grossman on ClickJacking attack



Another gotcha exists here as well. Internet Explorer there is security=restricted with regards to IFRAMES, which prevents the framebusting code from executing, as well as all other JS included on the page. So if the clickjacked targeted "button" DOES NOT utilize JavaScript, then the attack can still work.

Another possible option is out-of-band confirmation by the user. Email, SMS, etc

Regards,

Jeremiah Grossman
Chief Technology Officer
WhiteHat Security, Inc.
http://www.whitehatsec.com/


On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:23 AM, Guy Aharonovsky wrote:

Hi Sebastian,

Token based protection in conjunction with framebusting might just work.

Best,
Guy

Call me free at: http://jajah.com/guy
Visit me at: http://guya.net & http://jajahdevblog.com/guy

-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Schinzel [mailto:sebastian.schinzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 8:26 AM
To: bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: websecurity@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] Interview With Jeremiah Grossman on ClickJacking attack


Hi Robert,

bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb:
I've just published an interview with Jeremiah grossman on ClickJacking.
Looks as though CSRF token based protections may not be as safe as we
thought...

Thanks for the interview!

In the article you write:
"Does this break protections for flaws such as Cross-Site Request Forgery?
Yes. Clickjacking has the potential of breaking CSRF token-based
protections."


It is clear to me that token-based protections were never "academically
strong", but they were efficient in terms of cost-benefit for CSRF
protection.


If token-based protections may be busted soon, what protections should
now be used in today's productive Web applications to prevent CSRF
vulnerabilities?

Regards,
Sebastian

---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------
Join us on IRC: irc.freenode.net #webappsec


Have a question? Search The Web Security Mailing List Archives:
http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/

Subscribe via RSS:
http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss [RSS Feed]

Join WASC on LinkedIn
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA




********************************************************************** ********


This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by Jajah Inc. Mail system for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.

********************************************************************** ********





********************************************************************** ********
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by Jajah Inc. Mail system for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
********************************************************************** ********




---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------
Join us on IRC: irc.freenode.net #webappsec


Have a question? Search The Web Security Mailing List Archives:
http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/

Subscribe via RSS:
http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss [RSS Feed]

Join WASC on LinkedIn
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join us on IRC: irc.freenode.net #webappsec

Have a question? Search The Web Security Mailing List Archives: http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/

Subscribe via RSS: http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss [RSS Feed]

Join WASC on LinkedIn
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA



Brought to you by http://www.webappsec.org
Search this site