[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [WEB SECURITY] Re: Comparisons of Web ApplicationFirewalls
- From: Jeremiah Grossman <jeremiah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] Re: Comparisons of Web ApplicationFirewalls
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:25:26 -0700
On Jul 7, 2008, at 3:56 PM, Achim wrote:
!! Anyone want to make an open source WAF fingerprinter? :) Now
would be a great
!! time!
LOL
which WAF cannot be identified by it's cookie --which are most
likely not
changed in the configuration, (un)fortunatelly?
1. ModSecurity (as it doesn't use cookies ;-)
2. ..
..
There should be a few ways in addition to cookies actually.
Some of them encrypt or sign cookies, perhaps that could be
fingerprinted if a consistent format could be identified. They also
might respond consistently with particular malformed requests
differently than a web server would. Response codes, length, or even
an HTML error message. Some of them also scrub particular data types
in the response like internal IPs, credit card numbers, etc. With a
content spoofing vuln, these might be injected on the fly to see if
they magically vanish.
Just a few ideas. The tough part is getting a test-bed.
Jeremiah-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Join us on IRC: irc.freenode.net #webappsec
Have a question? Search The Web Security Mailing List Archives:
http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/
Subscribe via RSS:
http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss [RSS Feed]
Join WASC on LinkedIn
http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA
Brought to you by http://www.webappsec.org
Search this site
|