[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [WEB SECURITY] security audit - how to avoid legal prosecution
- From: DasPadre@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] security audit - how to avoid legal prosecution
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:48:00 EDT
-------------------------------1118368080
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I would advise you to take the Auditing course offered by SANS.org.
You receive about 40 hours in lectures and almost 1 meter's height in
reference material.
Anybody conducting any automated "Vulnerability Assessment" without a written
"sanctioned" agreement/authorization is opening themselves up for some type
of punitive action. Whether it be internal (making yourself open to HR/Policy
violations - and you or they should have a policy strictly prohibiting the
"free-lance" Vulnerability assessment), or be it external and then you may have
problems with local law, liable suits, etc.
I would also have the written agreement from at least a Director or V.P.
level. If the assessment goes south, the higher authority may be a little upset,
but you would be in a protected zone.
Unannounced assessments are good and encouraged, but, they too should fall
into some type of prearranged written agreement / policy and be conducted by
personnel or consultants that are "vetted." Meaning they are certified and
unbiased.
So the bottom line is: No Authorization - No Automated Assessments.
SIgned,
- the Wannabe Security Guru
P.S. I am not affiliated with SANS except as a InfoSec Student.
-------------------------------1118368080
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><HEAD>
<META charset=3DUS-ASCII http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; cha=
rset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffff=
f">
<DIV>I would advise you to take the Auditing course offered by SANS.org.</DI=
V>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You receive about 40 hours in lectures and almost 1 meter's height in r=
eference material.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Anybody conducting any automated "Vulnerability Assessment" without a w=
ritten "sanctioned" agreement/authorization is opening themselves up for som=
e type of punitive action. Whether it be internal (making yourself ope=
n to HR/Policy violations - and you or they should have a policy strictly pr=
ohibiting the "free-lance" Vulnerability assessment), or be it external and=20=
then you may have problems with local law, liable suits, etc.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I would also have the written agreement from at least a Director or V.P=
. level. If the assessment goes south, the higher authority may be a l=
ittle upset, but you would be in a protected zone.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Unannounced assessments are good and encouraged, but, they too should f=
all into some type of prearranged written agreement / policy and be conducte=
d by personnel or consultants that are "vetted." Meaning they are cert=
ified and unbiased.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>So the bottom line is: No Authorization - No Automated Assessment=
s.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>SIgned,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> - the Wannabe Security Guru</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>P.S. I am not affiliated with SANS except as a InfoSec Student.</=
DIV></BODY></HTML>
-------------------------------1118368080--
Brought to you by http://www.webappsec.org
Search this site
|